Start Submission Become a Reviewer

Reading: Values and Veils in Danish and Norwegian Parliamentary Debates and the Absence of Gender

Download

A- A+
dyslexia friendly

Articles (special issue)

Values and Veils in Danish and Norwegian Parliamentary Debates and the Absence of Gender

Author:

Jonas Lindberg

Uppsala University, SE
X close

Abstract

This is a case study on the kinds of values that were invoked in the parliamentary debates in 2009 on whether or not Danish judges and Norwegian policewomen should be allowed to wear veils for religious reasons in their line of duty. The case marks a shift and the limits of the until-then fairly liberal religious accommodation by the two states. Despite the high esteem of gender equality in Denmark and Norway, gender values are less referred to in these debates and the most common values are instead secularism, secular progress and neutrality or, more explicitly, the impartiality and credibility of the state. The findings are understood as a sign of the adaptive character of symbolic politics to focus on different values depending on the issue, as the underlying purpose is to distinguish between the majority population and (religious) minorities through the use of a narrative of secular progress. A secularism based on such narrative is used to express a clash between values associated with secularity, freedom and modernity and religion, oppression and tradition, here symbolised by the wearing of veils.
DOI: http://doi.org/10.18352/rg.10121
How to Cite: Lindberg, J., (2015). Values and Veils in Danish and Norwegian Parliamentary Debates and the Absence of Gender. Religion and Gender. 5(2), pp.135–149. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18352/rg.10121
122
Views
62
Downloads
Published on 17 Dec 2015.
Peer Reviewed

Downloads

  • PDF

    comments powered by Disqus